Matt is that an aged, tye-dyed sand bed I see in there or what? You got it cycled that quick? Awesome sand proportions, that picture brings it out better than ever. I just got through asking Dr. Shimek about his views on a well-established nano DSB, and I took his answers as positive for what I was asking. He mentioned that our DSB's even when well-fed and balanced will lack biodiversity in the sandbed, as he is a staunch proponent of volume to carry out the tasks of reduction and diversity support.
We did not however discuss the effects of possibly three or four dominant species in a DSB who have developed large numbers (enough that you see tracks everywhere) because of your food/protein input regimen. I feel these organisms can be raised to large numbers in terms of animals per square inch, each competing for fine food particles to the point there is none left over to rot. All primary foods have passed through the gut of one or more organisms, and mineralization is relatively quick. I bet you see tons of tracks in your bed, just wait another six months. So I am saying it doesnt matter how many different kinds of detritivores you have, its how many you have and what niche they occupy. My DSB is very old now and I wouldnt trade it for the world--a worm track is found in every square centimeter. Now imagine this one you have 100 times bigger!
He seemed to agree that a nano DSB could run indefinately if it were balanced correctly--this is different from a short time ago when professionals discredited the ability of nano reefs. When asked a sensible question about nanos, I think Dr. Shimek gives a reliable answer and it was neat to hear him acknowledge the balance potential of Nano DSB's. We are affecting current rule and practice.