• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok, let me describe what you've just read. "Dormant" and "subclinical" are not used interchangably. When the virus is dormant, it has a subclinical expression (that is, clinical diagnosis can not be ascertained). In other words, subclinical is a direct correlative result of the virus being dormant.

Here's an example to help elucidate the idea:
If I'm asleep, unconciousness makes me unable to render judgement.

You wouldn't say asleep and unconsciousness are synonomous. Do they have a positive relationship? yes. Do they mean the same thing? no.
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Leonard:

This is getting ridiculous.
We've been splitting hairs over the difference between subclinical and dormant for almost 2 pages.

I've shown you dictionary entries which show them as synonyms in usage.
I've shown you these 2 terms used in a medical study next to each other to describe the one and same situation (dormant HPV virus).

You haven't shown anything to the contrary regarding the semantics.
You haven't shown anything to the contrary regarding the practical implication.
You haven't because you can't.
You can strain the language and your keyboard all you can, but your crusade is pointless.

whether you call Ich dormant or subclinical, it is inactive, and that's all that matters.

I am through with silly this debate.

LeoR
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
john f:

Did I say that people eating healthy food don't get sick?

I didn't, so what's your point?

LeoR
 

MattM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by LeoR:
<strong>whether you call Ich dormant or subclinical, it is inactive, and that's all that matters.</strong><hr></blockquote>

NO it's NOT, that's the point we've been trying to make for the last two pages!

C. irritans that is dormant is in the cyst stage and not capable of infecting anything.

C. irritans that is subclinical is going through it's normal life cycle and infecting fish, just not at a sufficient level to be observable.

It can remain dormant for 30-35 days at most, but it can be subclinical for years.
 

Jawbone

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by MandarinFish:
<strong>I am kinda re-iterating what I asked in another thread because I believe it deserves a seperate, identifiable thread (Mod - delete this if too redundant)...

Do cleaner shrimps and gobies prevent or minimize disease?

What else can minimize or prevent disease ahead of time?

an ounce of prevention....</strong><hr></blockquote>

Hey Mandarin hows your answers going I got lost a long time ago... oh BTW My wife and freinds worked at T.Bros when they first opened and for awhile thereafter (Britnie Wife thing, Jane and Tammy )
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MattM:

Wrong on several counts, but I'm not going to waste time on this subject anymore.

LeoR
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Russ:

"Heads are WAY too big!! This is a HOBBY! Spelled H-O-B-B-Y!"

Well said (and I'll take my part of the blame).

Time to go back to our aquatic "guests".

LeoR
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

Anyone ever hear of marine velvet? Amyloodinia is so like ich, and the infected fish will announce its infection with similar reactions to ich: flashing, rapid respiration and scratching against rocks. Most hobbyists wouldn't be able to tell the difference before a fish dies. I'm not so sure how to deal with marine velvet - but I've done my bit of experimenting with marine ich, and even been lucky enough to have been engaged for some testing for Ruby Reef. So has Terry, and if I've any knowledge of this parasite, Terry is the library.
icon_biggrin.gif
Seriously, if you are a newer hobbyist, and scratching your head, thinking that we are a bunch of dolts scratching our heads and only "theorizing" and arguing about this parasite - there actually has been some conclusive studies done on both marine and freshwater ich.

First and foremost - apply the "virgin tank" theory to a new system. Ich is not poured in with the salt, nor is it a ready hitchiker on fresh water. Suppose you lay down a DSB, cycle with shrimp (hey, there's a pretty good article on that, somewhere!
icon_wink.gif
) and use all dry base rock. No ich, agreed? Now, we take and acclimate a fish that has been quarantined, with no trophozoites burrowed or otherwise present on the fish. We certainly know we can kill the parasite, and thus we can even insure that we take steps to preclude any assumed presence, in a strict test example. As we let the tank mature, even seeding it with some premium live rock, also quarantined (by this, I mean that it sits in a well lit, cycled tank with no fish/hosts) the tank will become a full bore "marine system." There. We let things sit, feeding normally, but never introducing anything else. We have an ich-free system. So, by example, ich is not present in "all" marine systems. We must introduce it. It has a definite life-cycle, and we are not "struggling" to understand it. Well, not all of us.
icon_wink.gif
There are a variety of ways to combat this parasite, and indeed there is no better evidence that a parasite-free tank to "document" the very "possibility" that some think still exists. This particular parasite does not appear out of thin water and in any instance of outbreak, I always recommend "starving" the tank, thereby eliminating the reproductive cycle of the parasite, which science is not undetermined about.

To be sure, ich is present in some folks' systems for quite a duration. I'm also readily convinced that some folks "observe" no ich, and then might lose a fish to marine velvet, or even an outbreak of ich itself. But this has always been present in their system - not everyone's systems. There are certainly "virgin" setups, and I've got two right now. Don't mistake "virgin" with being "new." Quite seasoned, they've just never had the ich parasite introduced. My chances of introducing it are quite limited. My lost joy of choosing colorful fish is countered by the fact that I've no "attrition" which requires me to replace fish. I also suppose my powder-blue and yellow tang are considered some of the more "prone" fish to host this parasite.

We know much facts about C.irritans. Hundreds of infecting tomites are released from a single mature trophont. It is inarguable that ich can continue a severely "reduced" lifestyle, given that only a few tomites are needed to infect and go relatively unnoticed - continuing the lifecycle as science has determined it. But just as our fish would die if we don't feed them, the parasite will die if there's no host for it. There has not been a single incident of a reported "Rip Van Winkle" type trophont. Their life-cycle is well-documented. Nobody here needs to "prove" what science has determined for us.

Just as sure as longhorn cows don't magically appear in my systems, neither will the C.irritans parasite.
icon_wink.gif
There are steps some folks will take that lead to successful additions of fish/corals without introducing the parasite. Such quarantine methods can be quite effective. I personally advocate a two-month quarantine, with hyposalinity being applied at a one-month mark - as long as the fish appears to be in good health thus far. Some folks gamble. Some folks gamble until they have a major devastation, and then they quarantine successfully for about 5 years or so,
icon_wink.gif
until they feel "comfortable" and "educated" about making a "wise choice" at their lfs. Again, they have returned to gambling. I've had my fish way too long to ever risk not quarantining.

The topic thread is about PREVENTING illness, not in treating it. I think it is not unfair to preclude that we can prevent the introduction of ich into a system - thereby creating an "ich-free" system.

We are learning more and more about the hobby... but some things are handed to us by nature - and we've yet to alter them. We can can alter/reduce/eliminate many items found in the "integrity" of the natural reef when we maintain a closed-system. Ich is always present in nature. Our tanks consist only of the components of nature we introduce. Quarantine is an excellent measure of preventing many diseases.

I've been lucky enough to have engaged in some work with the same company Terry has done some testing for. While we may have different conclusions as to the worthiness of a particular product, I'd certainly never call him an "idiot" for having a different opinion. Indeed, I'd think he's the #1 "go-to" person if a hobbyist has any questions about ich. I'm always glad to lend a hand with treating ich in a living reef, although I'll agree with Terry that hypo is the best method.

Anyway, I'm not a "regular" and I hope I've not stepped on any "residential experts" who may have a differing opinion than mine. But I always say it's better to learn to ride a bike from someone with acquired balance - not from someone who believes falling down is part of the ride. Terry is a pretty seasoned "rider." I'm not in any particular fan club - indeed, I think of him as a "colleague" - I don't sugar up to anybody. But it does bother me to see Terry referred to as an idiot.... I don't think anybody here is an idiot... There's just some differences in how folks deal with this ich parasite, and some folks would rather eliminate it than accept it as a resident in their systems. Again, if you don't feed the fish, they'll starve. If you don't feed algae - it disappears. If you don't feed ich, it dies.

Well, my girls have been promised some of that nice mixed-berry pie and ice-cream, and it's a school night. I'm rather favouring a slice myself!
icon_smile.gif
Our 18-month old is being more obnoxious than the whole lot of you could ever be with your e-hate,
icon_wink.gif
so give up on that race!
icon_biggrin.gif
Again, I hope nobody is offended, because everybody here has made some excellent, and correct points. I disagree with some statements, mainly that Terry is an idiot, and also with the conclusion that ich is "always present" in our systems.

I really agree with the one word someone just reminded us of. H-O-B-B-Y

Good night, all!!!

Monty
 

Terry B

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you Matt for providing so many references. I am sure that you are aware that I have used many of these same references in the articles that I have written on the subject. I know that you and I have discussed Cryptocaryon irritans at length and are essentially of one opinion (other than the percentage thing). Thank you Matt, John, Leonard and Monty for trying to reason with LeoR. It remains to be seen if he can benefit.
Terry B

[ April 19, 2002: Message edited by: Terry B ]</p>
 

Terry B

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
LeoR,
To begin with, I see through your thinly veiled attempt to change the subject here. The subject here has to do with your insistence that proper nutrition, good water quality and no stress makes fish immune to all diseases.
You said:
“And in that respect, a pound of food beats a truckload of cure.
The (long lost) secrets of long life in aquarium are:
1. Food.
2. Good food.
3. Plenty of food.
4. Clean water.
5. No bullies.”

Then you said:

“Yes, proper food can and will prevent most diseases, including ich.
Why and how it works is simple:
Proper nutrition makes fish healthy and provides all the stuff it needs for self-defense. A
healthy fish with a strong immune system can fend off most diseases without any outside intervention.”

Despite my own and others repeated requests you have still not provided any references to support your views. I did not disagree with the idea that a healthy fish with a strong immune system can fend off most disease. I said:
“I am not disagreeing with the importance of good nutrition, pristine water quality, or a
low stress environment. All of those things do contribute to the overall health of the fish. What I do disagree with is the idea that properly taking care of the needs of the fish makes them immune to an external parasite, specifically Cryptocaryon irritans. Ich can and does attack otherwise healthy fish in an aquarium and in the wild.”

You also go on to say “Ich is present in most tanks, usually in dormant stage, all the time.”

Again I asked for a reference to support your contention to no avail. It is an established fact and common knowledge at fisheries that Cryptocaryon irritans is NOT always present. If I had the time tonight I would quote a statement by Wedemeyer and his studies that contradicts your opinion. Ich can be cleared from a system and it can be prevented in all likelihood by practicing proper preventive measures such as quarantine.
You seem to disagree with the importance of quarantine. I would like to point out that every author of a book on our hobby suggests quarantine and that it is standard protocol at all public aquariums. There seems to be 100% agreement between them on this, yet you have said that it isn’t important. I have had personal conversations about quarantine with people like Martin Moe JR. and Julian Sprung. This is a matter of public record as my discussion with them was published in FAMA. I asked a panel of some of the most well known figures in the hobby what they felt was THE single most important piece of advice that they would like to give hobbyists. Most of them immediately said that they would advise people to practice quarantine. None of them disagreed with its importance. This thread began as a question on how to prevent disease, I suggested quarantine.
I respect your right to have an opinion based on whatever you wish to base it on.
I however prefer to base my opinion on more than just my own personal experience (30 years a marine aquarist). The foundation of my opinion includes published scientific journals detailing the subject of Cyrptocaryon irritans, the best fish disease books available and personal communications with people such as Dr. Edward Noga professor of aquatic medicine at NCSU and Dr. Angelo Colorni at the Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research Ltd. Dr. Noga must be considered among the elite in his field. Dr. Colorni is esteemed by his peers as the worlds foremost authority on Cryptocaryon irritans. My personal experience concurs will all of these sources.
I previously offered a two part article that I wrote which was published a couple of years ago. This is only one of several that I have written on the subject and it is froth with references to the scientific journals. “Maybe you would like to start by reading one of my published articles on the subject that it full of references to the scientific literature that you can look up for yourself? (Offered articles)”
Your response was:

“No, sorry, I wouldn't. I do not obtain my knowledge from second-hand wanna-bes.”

Some time later in this thread someone else suggested you could find answers by reading something that I had written on the subject. Then you said:

“If Terry has published answers to my questions before he can simply post a link.”

Then you said:
“I just want to see what <b>you</b> know right now, not what you can find in other people's books.
So one sentence is fine, as long as it answers the question.
As for the answers:
Nice try, but no cigar.
Of course I asked these questions because I know the answers.
This is all well known stuff, so an expert in the field can answer almost every question in less than 1 minute without consulting any books.
So, you've already lost your expert bonus, but keep on with your research -- learning how much you don't know may help you with your attitude.”

Well I am sure that it is clear to anyone unbiased that I not only answered your little test to see if I know enough to talk about the subject, I answered your questions (in print) BEFORE you asked them.

I also offered to exchange references: “OK LeoR lets take this out of the realm of what you believe based on whatever you base your personal opinion on and talk about what the scientific literature has to say on the subject. I tell you what, you give me a reference to support your view from the scientific literature if you can come up with one.”

How many times do you have to be asked for verifiable references? And yet when I offer verifiable references to support my opinions you call me an “idot.” I wonder if you realize what that makes you look like in the eyes of others?

Next it is your turn so we are going to test your knowledge to see if you can discuss “advanced topics.”
More to come.
Terry B
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Terry B:

You're arguing with your imagination, not with my statements.
Here's a sample:

TB: "To begin with, I see through your thinly veiled attempt to change the subject here."

Who changed the subject from nutrition to dormant stage of Ich?
Of course, it was you, not me.
Your attempt to cheat in the very first sentence is laughable as the truth is just a click away.


TB: "The subject here has to do with your insistence that proper nutrition, good water quality and no stress makes fish immune to all diseases."

Where did I say "ALL disease"?
I didn't, I said "most". The difference between ALL and MOST is known even to worms, who hide ALL of their body in a crevice, because if they hide only MOST of it, they could end up being eaten.

Your deliberate misrepresentations are getting ridiculous.


TB: "You seem to disagree with the importance of quarantine."
(Then you go on ranting half a page about the importance of quarantine)

Where did I say that I disagree with quarantine?
Nowhere, of course.
Your persistent and bold lies are getting really old.


TB: "Well I am sure that it is clear to anyone unbiased that I not only answered your little test to see if I know enough to talk about the subject, I answered your questions (in print) BEFORE you asked them."

Where are the answers? Whom are you trying to fool here?
Hic Rhodos, hic salta. If you knew the answers you would have supplied them.
You don't, that's why you haven't.


TB: "And yet when I offer verifiable references to support my opinions you call me an “idot.”

Are you being stupid or dishonest here?
I called you "idiot" because you claimed to have mind-reading abilities. [see page 2].


Obviously, your goal is not an honest debate.
So, this is my last post to you.

LeoR

[ April 19, 2002: Message edited by: LeoR ]</p>
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I can't believe thi thread. i just read the whole thing and it is obvious there is one person that knows how to carry on a civil debate. It is equally obvious there is one that doesn't. Cases should be argued on the merit of the evidence presented. I see one side presenting evidence and the other smoke and mirrors. Leo, get rid of the smoke, it can't be blown here. Please try to respond with evidence ie references. You seem to want to foucus on one thing. Please try to educate those of us who may not have the access to all of the knowledge there is or know where ot find it. Give me some references to refute those Terry has given so many times over the years of helping us to understand the different practices that have been so effective at helping me keep my tank healthy.
 

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by LeoR:
<strong>MattM:

Wrong on several counts, but I'm not going to waste time on this subject anymore.

LeoR</strong><hr></blockquote>

It's ambigious responses like these, and your incredibly abrasive personality (e.g. calling people idiots, silly, etc.) that distracts from constructive discussions. The academic/scientific world does not enjoy shadow boxing.

I won't be as civil as cjdevito. I will emphatically state that I find you have very little credibility. You refuse to cite references, and instead choose to engage in name-calling tactics and "I said so, so it must be so" arguments. Be done with this thread .... you've contributed nothing substantial anyhow, and you're solely responsible for this thread's digression for the worse.

There is a very plausible reason why people disagree with you: you're unwiling to validate your suppositions, and a lot of what you've suggested is contrary to scientific findings. There is also a very plausible reason why people don't like you: you're a caustic and dogmatic man. Maybe it's time for a little self-reassessment.
 

Chucker

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
icon13.gif
First of all, I would have to say I'm rather disappointed in the tone that appeared earlier in the thread. There is no need for the name calling back and forth. The board is here for a free exchange of ideas and information related to the hobby, not for pissing matches.

With that being said, I'd like to ask a question....

Terry, would you happen to have the references cited in your saltwaterfish.com posts handy? They are listed throughout the articles, but there is no full Lit Cited section at the end of the second part. I think it would be beneficial to all concerned if we could see that list (or if it could be added to the end of your post there).

Thanks in advance!
 

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Russ:
<strong>Heads are WAY too big!! This is a HOBBY! Spelled H-O-B-B-Y!</strong><hr></blockquote>

It's not just a hobby, it's a lifestyle choice
icon_wink.gif


But to be more serious, for some, it's far more then a past-time hobby. For me, it's a passion. For others, it's their life's dedication and/or livilihood (this includes several people who've participated in this thread).
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Leonard:
<strong> There is also a very plausible reason why people don't like you: you're a caustic and dogmatic man. Maybe it's time for a little self-reassessment.</strong><hr></blockquote>

It's like wack-a-mole on this board... soon as one goes away another appears!
icon_biggrin.gif
 

LeoR

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Anyone here still seriously interested in discussing disease prevention for the sake of the hobby? Let us know.
Genuine questions and honest debaters only, please.

To politician-style word twisters, Bart-level ("You can't prove anything") debaters, self-appointed psychologists, nannies for resident prima-donnas, wounded egos in need of repair and whiners about the heat or style:
There is plenty of elbow room in "The Sump".

LeoR
 

Len

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by LeoR:
<strong>To put it as generously and gently as possible:

Only a complete idiot could write what you wrote above.

Have a nice day.

LeoR</strong><hr></blockquote>

Honestly, Leo, you don't see the problem with addressing people in this manner? Can you understand why you aren't better received here? Being an idiot myself, I'd like to better understand why someone would respond (repeatedly) in this fashion.

The funny thing is, concerning preventive measures, I don't think we (you, me, terry, matt, et. al.) differ very much in suggestions.

[ April 19, 2002: Message edited by: Leonard ]</p>
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top