i agree with you randy. the guy is a total nut. the unfortunate part of this is that the nut is actually making some good (or at least valid) points.
as for the argument that if we prevent collection for the trade there will be even more destructive consequences, well, i guess i agree with that too. where i disagree is that this should be an argument for doing nothing. this is the classic position that powerholders use to maintain the status quo. the "yeah, we know things are crappy and we made them this way, but god only knows how much worse it will be if we change" its the argument that the banks made last year, its the argument that the oil industry tries to make regarding new energy technology, deep water drilling, etc.
i guess my final issue would be with the theory that collection makes people more likely to preserve the reefs. looking at our previous record of sustainable harvest, i am not so sure that this is the case. i would even go so far as to say we as humans have over-exploited almost every resource we have come across, leaving mostly devastation in our wake. just look at the state of the worlds fisheries, which were supposed to be sustainably managed for the last 40 years or so, and that is a much bigger business with much bigger consequences than ornamental fish...