esmar tuek":2fm8p49d said:
esmithiii":2fm8p49d said:
Well, it all depends on the
metric that you use to determine "largest blackout"- it could be megawatt hours lost, or people hours. If you look at people-hours, since the north east US blackout was longer (up to 48 hrs for many as opposed to 13 for the indian blackout) it could potentially be "larger".
yep, esmithiii, you are right :wink:
same goes for blackouts and earthquakes .... one that kill 10 can be worse than the one that kill 200 000.
what makes the worst earthquake is how high it goes on the Richter's scale. not how many pople it kills/impacts, right? :roll:
L8r,
Esmar tuek-
You are obviously missed the sarcastic tone of my post. That is why I used the Winking Emoticon.
Seriously, 60 million people without power for 24 hours, a good portion of those were effected for 48hrs while the indian blackout was for 13 hours. If you consider the
cost of the two blackouts, this one
was the biggest in the world's history (not counting the millenia before electricity was discovered, of course.)
Ernie