<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mouse:
<STRONG>There is a big difference between a calculated error and gross incompetance!</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, but in this case, perhaps the difference is moot. You can see from a prior post on this thread that someone else has done the same thing successfully. It just as easily could've been a calculated choice/risk as opposed to lack of research/not asking.
I've got two yellow tangs and a purple in my 180. I knew it was a risk when I put them in, but I DID research it and ask lots of questions, and I took a calculated risk that this wouldn't work out. I went with three of the same genus because I felt that would give me the best chance of success, and added all three simultaneously. Obviously, success with these was not guaranteed. Luckily, it did work out. But it did depend somewhat on a little luck.
What if it hadn't worked out? Would I then be flamed for relating my experience of losing a tang because I put two yellows in one tank and one killed the other? I should hope not.
There are no guarantees in this hobby. One can know the risks and voluntarily take the risks, or one can go blindly forward. In this case, Liu was taking a risk, just as if he'd researched it and decided to give it a try, but he just didn't realize it. In either case, that doesn't change the fact of what happened, and in either case, whether his fish choice would work out depends on a little luck.
I don't think it's fair to take this position. Sure, he should have done some research, and he'll probably do a lot more research in the future before making new additions. However, the facts are the facts. And the fact is that even if he'd have researched it, he might have done the exact same thing, as it's worked out for others.