So your saying the sigma 150 f2.8 is the way to go, huh. Its getting the bet reviews. I'll look into the 60mm too.
Sent from my iPhone using Reefs
olivier said:DHaut,
Sigma 150 f2.8 is a kicka$$ lens. very very nice sharp lens. I used to have it and trade in for tamron 180 f4. totally regret. very fast focus while tamron is hunting like crazy on my nikon F5, nikon F4, nikon F6 and nikon D300. I trade in for tamron 180 b'cause i do a lot with flower macro and need long lens to throw background cluster out. Then when I switch to digital, the Tamron 180 f4 x 1.5 crap factor become too long of a lens on DSLR. . I should kept the sigma 150 f2.8 HSM. I highly recommend this lens over nikon 105 AFS VR or Canon 100 macro lens due to price vs performance. sigma is comming out with a 60mm macro lens soon. check with dpreview to see when the lens is on market.
I need to do money vs performance in trade study when buying camera lens because i have too many hobbies that my spouse upsad about. I feel bad that i spend too much money on motocycle, SW fish tank, cameras + lenses . Totally wish money from the tree.
Sent from my iPhone using Reefs