StevenPro":1baxcqe7 said:"Steven, the voluntary unsuitable species list USL, never suggested that expert hobbyists should be denied access to USL species."
Wayne, how in the world are you, or worse yet the government, going to define expert aquarists?
naesco":2o8qkmt5 said:Thales":2o8qkmt5 said:naesco":2o8qkmt5 said:Thales":2o8qkmt5 said:Without data, internet or otherwise, this is all he said/she said and will get us nowhere - as will arguments to authority without documentation/support.
The polarizing of this issue not only helps make any discussion almost useless, it is also an inaccurate reflection of reality. For instance, many people with experience think some kind of reasonable collection of Moorish Idols is fine as some of them do seem to do well in captivity.
I would really like this issue to continue to be discussed, but if it degrades we will lock the thread. Please, everyone, I know emotions are high here, but we may have a chance to have an actual discussion, without heat, that could benefit everyone.
Thanks.
Thales many people with experience including anyone that has written anything about marine fish would never agree that there should be any sort of collection of Moorish Idols.
Who are the 'people with experience' you are talking about.?
Most of the entities/authors mentioned earlier in this thread have a disclaimer about the difficulty keeping these animals, but don't say they should never be collected.
Wayne, it is simply not the case that "ANYONE that has written ANYTHING about marine fish would NEVER agree that there should be ANY sort of collection of Moorish Idols". Your quote is one of the polarizing, extreme kinds of statements that is factually inaccurate and only serves to make the discussion combative rather than inclusive. The issue is very complicated, and while I understand the desire to distill it, it just isn't that simple.
My question was very simple. Please name the people with experience you speak of. Another poster listed some of the well known authors and their opinion.
Nothing combative here.
naesco":xtjqap8o said:The purpose of the USL was to discourage loser LFS and wholesalers from importing fish that had no chance of survival in hobbyist tanks.
Industry did nothing to stop this practice and tonnes of USL fish died.
Fortunately hobbyists educated themselves through reef forums and courageous marine fish authors and IMO importing USL fish has virtually stopped. For example, years ago Moorish Idol were commonly seen for sale in Vancouver LFS. I have not seen one for sale for years because hobbyists knew not to buy them. On many occasions in the past I and others complained in front of other customers when they were for sale.
StevenPro":3eems4fm said:On a somewhat related note, did any of you hear about Matt Pederson's work with the orange spotted filefish. This is a fish that many people would argue should be left in the ocean. But, Matt has several pairs that he has trained off of corals and onto a prepared diet. And not only that, but some of his pairs have spawned and he even successfully reared some babies! Matt is not working at some public aquarium somewhere or a University. He is just doing this as an avid, dedicated hobbyist. But, if those fish had been placed onto some sort of do not collect list, he would not have been able to do this work. He would not have been able to even try.
Oh no.. what about FinalPhaze's shop, then? In Hayward (I've gotta go through my pm's, I'm pretty sure he linked me to the site). He hasn't been online in some time now. I hadn't had a chance to visit the shop, but I believe it's his father's and they focused on koi, but also have other fish offerings. I hope they're doing alright.Thales":21kl7fks said:However, the state of the economy seems to be forcing the kinds of businesses that don't really care what fills their tanks to go out of business. Many of the not great shops in the SF Bay area are vanishing. Even the infamous LFS whose business model is based on cut flowers isn't bringing in as many of the iffy fish, though many of their husbandry practices are still questionable.
seamaiden":bvyw8n2v said:Oh no.. what about FinalPhaze's shop, then? In Hayward (I've gotta go through my pm's, I'm pretty sure he linked me to the site). He hasn't been online in some time now. I hadn't had a chance to visit the shop, but I believe it's his father's and they focused on koi, but also have other fish offerings. I hope they're doing alright.Thales":bvyw8n2v said:However, the state of the economy seems to be forcing the kinds of businesses that don't really care what fills their tanks to go out of business. Many of the not great shops in the SF Bay area are vanishing. Even the infamous LFS whose business model is based on cut flowers isn't bringing in as many of the iffy fish, though many of their husbandry practices are still questionable.
seamaiden":13y1sr35 said:Oh, yes, Obama has little else on his plate, and so has plenty of time to get to regulating that awful aquatic ornamental industry. :lol:
seamaiden":uwyto2yh said:East Bay Koi. Their site is still up at least.
http://eastbaykoi.com/
naesco":1pyq6deg said:seamaiden":1pyq6deg said:Oh, yes, Obama has little else on his plate, and so has plenty of time to get to regulating that awful aquatic ornamental industry. :lol:
There are zillions of young OBAMITES just itching to change the world.
And Industry just sits and continues to do nothing waiting for the axe to fall.
Sad, eh!
seamaiden":3pjxowvo said:My point is that degradation of species cannot be blamed solely on the aquarium trade, not if there's also fishing allowed in these areas.
pyrrhus":r3g25xaq said:oceanfish":r3g25xaq said:Yellow Tangs commonly live for 20 - 30 years on a reef, and 40+ year olds have been found.
Where are you getting this information? It has been my understanding that the average life expectancy for most reef fish was around 7 years.