What is "unreasonable"?Len":2ink0g1k said:if the vendor feels the order placed by the customer is "unreasonable" according to their discretion?
Thales":13g4mj22 said:It should happen when the order is taken, not at the time of shipping. Refusing to take an unreasonable order is ok, altering an order without the permission of the customer is bad juju.
GreshamH":34wu4vuj said:Additional sales. If all 5 went to one person, they couldn't get the tag along sales as wellOnline buyers tend to buy more then one item when having something shipped. If you limit the 5 to 1, you can in theory get 4 more "tag along" sales.
Len":2ccuk8gw said:Here's a few possible scenarios:
1. Vendor feels the customer is not ready to maintain some of the livestock ordered.
2. Vendor feels fish poses danger to other organisms in the customer's system.
3. Vendor feels customer is ordering too many items at the same time.
They could know by the rest of the order or other recent orders that were placed.cvp7900":1auvyk5d said:Len":1auvyk5d said:Here's a few possible scenarios:
1. Vendor feels the customer is not ready to maintain some of the livestock ordered.
2. Vendor feels fish poses danger to other organisms in the customer's system.
3. Vendor feels customer is ordering too many items at the same time.
1. How would the vendor know?
2. ditto
3. It could be a group order.
bleedingthought":25z34trt said:They could know by the rest of the order or other recent orders that were placed.cvp7900":25z34trt said:Len":25z34trt said:Here's a few possible scenarios:
1. Vendor feels the customer is not ready to maintain some of the livestock ordered.
2. Vendor feels fish poses danger to other organisms in the customer's system.
3. Vendor feels customer is ordering too many items at the same time.
1. How would the vendor know?
2. ditto
3. It could be a group order.
GreshamH":w4txssqr said:Thales":w4txssqr said:It should happen when the order is taken, not at the time of shipping. Refusing to take an unreasonable order is ok, altering an order without the permission of the customer is bad juju.
So the vendor should watch all online transactions and reply in real time?
I think prior to charging the customer, the vendor has the right (IMO) to remove items (not add) from the order as they see fit. If they only have 5 cherries and they'd like 5 orders, I can see limitting an order to 1.
Len":moabj1cn said:Here's a few possible scenarios:
1. Vendor feels the customer is not ready to maintain some of the livestock ordered.
2. Vendor feels fish poses danger to other organisms in the customer's system.
3. Vendor feels customer is ordering too many items at the same time.
Thales":3qvpddc0 said:Len":3qvpddc0 said:Here's a few possible scenarios:
1. Vendor feels the customer is not ready to maintain some of the livestock ordered.
2. Vendor feels fish poses danger to other organisms in the customer's system.
3. Vendor feels customer is ordering too many items at the same time.
Len, are you talking online vendors? If so, I can only see number 3 as a possibility.![]()