A
Anonymous
Guest
beaslbob":2atcbmjw said:Righty":2atcbmjw said:beaslbob":2atcbmjw said:nm reef":2atcbmjw said:Long ago and far...far away I made a very simple request of your friend Beaselbob...."put up or shut up"...I simply requested that he post pics of his claimed success...his tank....not someone elses...so folks could see and judge for themselves if they wanted what bob claims as success in their homes.....the challenge is still there but I doubt he'll take me up on it.All this ramble and spouting of opinion/advice...but a lack of willingness to show physical evidence of HIS reef.......must not be real proud of it.
My old friend nmreef has followed my here.
He had a 55g with 29g macro refugium then upgraded to a 150-175 using the old 55g as a macro refugium. And therefore is using plant life just like I advise.
You advise way more than a simple planted 'fuge.
Yes. My advice is to simply take care of the plant life and the plant life will take care of your system. Everything else comes from that fact. The specific details may obscure that simple truth, but even with compeletly different setups that underlying fact still remains.
What you advocate is not a simple planted 'fuge, and your simple truth has only your opinions behind it. There are simply too many tanks that have nuked with a thriving macro fuge for your simple truth to be simple or true.
And, you didn't invent the planted fuge. Its been around a lot longer than you have been doing salt water.