oceanarus":1o8z7ujh said:I think you should take this very seriously and contact the person I referenced in the earlier post and I am sure we could save you some $$$ on this project!
andrejka said:The cause of ASW toxicity (if any) can be, for example, presence of plasticizers used in manufacturing process:
http://www.pfiesteria.org/publicati...inisolation.pdf or something else besides HM...
andrejka":249r2pxz said:The more I think of it, the more I'm convinced that we should do "urchin larva survival" test first (as in BEFORE we start looking for reasons why they die). If we do all the metal testing and find that ALL artificial salt mixes contain way too much heavy metals in comparison with NSW, what would we prove? That manufacturers of "Bioassay" salt lied about heavy metal content in their product? Who would be surprised?!!
JeremyR":zmuv7mbl said:<<Exactly! That's the whole point. Let's focus on the effect. Let the manufacturers pay for their own certified analysis if they want to. It's the results that are important. Isn't it?>>
Of course results matter, but I cannot comprehend why anyone would oppose knowing what is in their salt mix. Someone walks up to you with a sheet telling you what's in all the salts before you buy one while you are shopping.. are you going to read the sheet, or are you going to play ostrich and stick your head in a hole in the ground? Maybe you are opposed to the cost, but this is purely by donation.. meaning if you don't care to know what's in the salt.. don't donate. Only people that want to know are going to be out of pocket, so I don't see what the big deal is to you.
JohnL":2xgfikgs said:Let the manufacturers pay for their own certified analysis if they want to. It's the results that are important. Isn't it?