An LED array would have to be of considerable size to compete with even one 13w pc in terms of intensity--to approximate the effectiveness of a standard 13w 7700K pc lamp an LED array would need 200 LED bulbs as 2-3$ apiece, unless you find and modify a setup like Milton has discovered at Lowe's. He's made a nice find there, an exit sign that is very bright and powered via transformer onboard--just plug and go. Naturally, the red LED's need to replaced unless you want one heck of a night-viewing setup.
Id like to suggest something I really think you will like. In your particular situation, why not add more 13watters? Your problem would be the hassle of doing all the retrofitting work only to upgrade PC's, but what if you could add them hassle free? For $20 per setup, an Azoo Galaxy light can't be beat. It has a wall-wart ballast (less heat/less install space in hood)and a built in TINY clip and reflector--10 seconds installation time per unit. Two of them run my Mini75. If you buy combo bulbs for $7 apiece, a few of these babies in parallel will run some serious corals in a nano. As you can see they dont have massive penetrance, but when you stock right under them its all the same. What about a 70w MH addition, then switch your current PCs to all actinics?
bulbs=www.petmeister.com
Azoo lights=www.aquaticeco.com
I wanted to list perils of disappointment in working hard on an LED array just to find out it wasnt bright enough, even after $300 dollars and the effort. If you were dealing in palmtops it'd be easier to make lighting jumps with LED's, but for the larger nanos they are still very $$ inefficient.
Btw, can't remember where I read this (rough nite) but somewhere I just read about a formal study where a scientist compared the output of white to blue LED's on patches of acropora. Coincidentally, he finds a consistent pattern using the blue bulbs and inconsistent measures with the white-emitting bulbs...it seems standard led's have more photosynthetic tuning to go through before they'll rival daylight PC.