Recent content by JeremyR

So the boxes & paperwork had the proper scientific name on them, right? Not just "blue passer"?

I don't do alot of service, but all the service guys I know are complaining that people aren't paying their bills, but for some reason still expect their tanks to get cleaned. Amazing how that works eh?

I have the hidden immunity idol... :P

Reading all this, I think I just threw up a little bit.

You are a genius mitch!

I would like to know how you tell a fish is 40.5 years old. That's a pretty exact measurement :P

Yes, she is saying that "sustainable" doesn't mean "max numbers of fish" and so that while it might go on forever, it's not as "pretty" and therefore unfair to the snorkel vendors.

I hate to break it to you, but the death toll on yellow tangs in the hobby is nowhere near that breakdown. Nobody loses 20% of yellow tangs at every stage. If you are going to hide your identity and continue to spout propaganda, at least be honest about what happens with the fish in question...

Oh please. Btw, you seem to have inflated the 2007 #'s of dead fish in the last couple of pages. If we aren't careful here, the number of fish that died in 2007 may increase to 40 thousand.

Southwest gave our fish to someone else, and someone else our fish last week. Fortunately there were no dead bodies involved and it was caught pretty quick.

I love anonymous

Beuhler? Beuhler? Anyone?

Actually Wayne, the yellow tangs we have been getting lately have been fine.

Right. Unfortunately, when you apply logic things aren't exactly how you are trying to spin them. You are using numbers like 9000+ tangs died as a shock value tactic, when the rest of the world would love to only have a 3% loss rate. What it boils down too is that fish are a resource.. if...

Food fisherman probably have more loss/waste than 3%. Should they be shut down?