Sorry, didn't see anywhere else to put this.
I have some serious concerns regarding the assumptions made and voiced in Mr Jordan's article concerning air quality. Its well understood that CO2 concentrations in the water can affect pH in aquatic systems. However, the work he did (basically just sitting in a room monitoring levels) really doesn't mean anything. There were no replicates, no validation, and no references. It sounds more like an article written by someone with only mild understanding.
My real concern is that people will take the article at face value and not question its contents. The real factor affecting pH in a closed system, especially in a well established system, is more likely to be its occupants. While atomspheric concentrations of gases have a role, that role is moderated by exchange, saturation, and buffering capacity. None of those items are strongly mentioned nor considered.
In order to make the assumptions made in this context, he would have had to use a control tank (one with outside air source) and an exposure tank (indoor/high CO2 source) that had no photosynthesizing animals in them. In order to validate the points, replication would be needed.
I hope that my concerns don't seem outlandish or overly critical, but I don't want people coming away with the thought that bringing in outside air is an answer to pH problems in and of itself. As well, air quality is extremely variable depending on where you live and certain areas would be more detrimental to a tank.
Thanks,
Wade
I have some serious concerns regarding the assumptions made and voiced in Mr Jordan's article concerning air quality. Its well understood that CO2 concentrations in the water can affect pH in aquatic systems. However, the work he did (basically just sitting in a room monitoring levels) really doesn't mean anything. There were no replicates, no validation, and no references. It sounds more like an article written by someone with only mild understanding.
My real concern is that people will take the article at face value and not question its contents. The real factor affecting pH in a closed system, especially in a well established system, is more likely to be its occupants. While atomspheric concentrations of gases have a role, that role is moderated by exchange, saturation, and buffering capacity. None of those items are strongly mentioned nor considered.
In order to make the assumptions made in this context, he would have had to use a control tank (one with outside air source) and an exposure tank (indoor/high CO2 source) that had no photosynthesizing animals in them. In order to validate the points, replication would be needed.
I hope that my concerns don't seem outlandish or overly critical, but I don't want people coming away with the thought that bringing in outside air is an answer to pH problems in and of itself. As well, air quality is extremely variable depending on where you live and certain areas would be more detrimental to a tank.
Thanks,
Wade