• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

A

Anonymous

Guest
Article:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>
Lettuce and LEDs: Shedding New Light On Space Farming

By Todd Halvorson
Cape Canaveral Bureau Chief, SPACE.com

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- Ask most astronauts and cosmonauts what type of food they miss most on the International Space Station (news - web sites) and they'll tell you fresh salads are a culinary commodity craved in orbit.

That situation, however, soon could change.

Researchers here at NASA (news - web sites)'s Kennedy Space Center (news - web sites) are parlaying the technology used to develop the latest traffic signals into a salad machine that could enable station crews to grow and harvest their own greens within the next three years.

What's more, the type of advanced lighting systems now used in sprawling airplane maintenance facilities, automotive assembly lines and semiconductor clean rooms are being tested for potential use at Martian greenhouses.

And while a human expedition outside Earth orbit still might be years away, the space farming efforts are ultimately aimed at developing artificial light sources that promise to help make future explorers self-sufficient at space colonies on the moon, Mars or beyond.


"We know for a long-duration mission, say going to Mars, that there will be too much launch mass involved in order to take everything you need," said Gregory Goins, a research scientist with Dynamac Corp., the life sciences contractor here at NASA's coastal Florida spaceport.

"You just can't put enough in the picnic basket to survive."

So Goins and other Space Age gardeners are testing two high-efficiency light sources that future space colonists might use not only to grow food but also to generate and purify oxygen and water -- key sustainers of human life.

The removal of carbon dioxide from a closed environment is another added benefit.

"Plants are the only way we know of where we can generate enough food, water and oxygen to support humans for such a long flight because we know re-supply is not an option. And so plants are a very appealing approach to use," Goins said.

"But in order to use plants, you must have an energy source, and that energy source is light," he added. "And the lights we use in our homes are not energy efficient enough to get the job done. So that's why we're developing these innovative technology lights."

Take the common incandescent bulb invented by Thomas Edison more than a century ago, or the type of fluorescent lamps first developed in the 1920s.

Both contain electrodes that burn out, so the lights must be periodically replaced. And both gobble up electrical power -- a precious commodity in space -- while generating heat, which must be dispelled from closed environments such as spaceships and space stations.

"Standard light sources that we use in homes and in greenhouses and in growth chambers for controlled agriculture here on Earth are not efficient enough for space travel. Not only that, they don't last a very long time," Goins said.

"And in space, heat is like trash. You make it, and you've got to get rid of it, so we don't want heat. We want light."

In recent years, dramatic improvements in lighting technology have provided NASA and its support contractors with new means to develop low-power space-farming systems that will last the life of a building -- or a greenhouse on the surface of Mars.

Working in plant growth chambers the size of walk-in refrigerators, Goins and other plant physiologists here are experimenting with blue and red Light Emitting Diodes, or LEDs, to grow salad plants such as lettuce and radishes.

Similar to devices now used to manufacture advanced traffic lights, the LEDs enable researchers to eliminate other wavelengths found within normal white light, thus reducing the amount of energy required to power the plant growth lamps.

The LEDs generate less heat, and while leaves take on a black hue due to the lack of green light to reflect, the plants grow normally and taste the same as those raised in white light.

"What we've found basically is that we are able to limit the amount of color we give to the plants and still have them grow as well as with white light," Goins said.

"Being plant physiologists, we know the chlorophyll molecule well enough that we know which wavelengths most efficiently stimulate plant growth, and it turns out to be blue and red. So I don't have to devote energy to green light, and my plant will grow just as well."

Nevertheless, green light can be added for aesthetic purposes.

"So if you're in orbit for a long time, not only do the plants taste good but they actually appear as plants do on the ground," Goins said. "But we also know we can eliminate the green light if energy costs are a concern -- and they usually are in space travel."

Another bonus: The LEDs can last the length of a round-trip mission to Mars, unlike incandescent or fluorescent bulbs, which require frequent replacement.

A second long-lasting light source being tested here: Sulfur Microwave Lamps.

Now used to light up large airplane hangars, shopping malls and gymnasiums, these high-performance lamps were first developed in 1991 and one day might be used to light conservatories on the surface of Mars. "The microwave lamp is a technology where we're thinking about a large-scale system like a greenhouse on Mars, where we can illuminate a large growth area," Goins said. "It is the most efficient electric lighting source known to man."

Twice as efficient as other high-intensity sources, the microwave lamps can generate as much light as the noonday sun. The light in fact is so bright that it can be funneled through pipes and then distributed over large areas, such as a hothouse on the Martian highlands.

The lamps also are dimmable, so space colonists would be able to attenuate light within their greenhouse to match the growing cycles of their crops.

"When there are small seedlings, you don't want a very bright light," Goins said. "But then you could turn the lamps up accordingly as the plants got bigger."

The bulbs, meanwhile, are simple hollow quartz spheres with sulfur and argon gasses that are energized with microwaves. And with no filament to burn out, researchers think the lamps could prove to be the perfect light source for a space colony.

"Theoretically, the microwave lamps should last for years and years, and we've found that to be the case," Goins said.

With an investment of just $80,000 to $100,000 over the past three years, the high-tech lighting systems here have been used to grow potatoes, sweet potatoes, lettuce, spinach, radishes, wheat onion and a whole plethora of herbs such as marjoram and parsley.

The plants typically are grown hydroponically, or without soil. Water laced with a nutrient solution is circulated within plant growth chambers that are lit up with either the LEDs or the Sulfur Microwave Lamps.

And while greenhouses and space colonies on Mars are still a long way off, Goins said a specially designed LED plant growth chamber should be ready for launch to the international station within the next three years.

"I would probably call it a salad machine," Goins said.

About half the size of a tall file cabinet, the plant growth chamber would enable station astronauts and cosmonauts to grow and harvest salad greens, herbs and vegetables during typical four-month tours on the outpost.

"Now this salad machine wouldn't be built on a scale large enough to actually give the crew all the food they need," Goins said. "It would be just a supplemental endeavor in the near term."

But it would have psychological benefits for station crews, too.

"When you're inside a can for several months, I can see where having something green and living onboard would be very appealing," Goins said.

"So to have an herb garden or a salad machine actually on the space station would make the stays in space more pleasurable," he added. They would just love that."
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
 

scavdog

Advanced Reefer
Location
Boston
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Interesting as hell to say the least

Light Drive 1000...the future of lighting for reefs??
icon_biggrin.gif

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Take a golf-ball size sphere of quartz, add the element sulfur, and bombard it with microwaves. The result is the sulfur lamp, developed—through the Lighting Program's support—by Fusion Lighting, a Maryland-based manufacturer of lighting systems based on sulfur lamp technology. The sulfur lamp has many advantages over other lamps:

It uses less than 20% of the energy of a traditional incandescent lamp of equivalent brightness.
Its output remains constant over time, instead of weakening like conventional lamps.
Because its strength remains constant, there is no need to compensate for weakening by using an excessively powerful lamp.
Its lifetime is nearly unlimited because it does not have filaments or electrodes to burn out.
It has exceptional color quality, closely matching the spectrum of sunlight.
Unlike other high-efficiency lamps, the sulfur lamp uses no mercury and produces 50% less ultraviolet light.
Fusion's Light Drive(tm) 1000 sulfur lamp has a projected lifetime of 60,000 hours, or almost 7 years of continuous use. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

[ September 26, 2001: Message edited by: ScavDog ]
 

bowfront

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very cool article. I'm completely sure that we are on the brink of new lighting in this hobby. MH is just too sloppy. It runs too hot and not very efficiently. Florecents are ok but bulky and just not bright enough. What we need is a light bulb the size of a golf ball that runs without a ballast at room temp and is brighter than a 400w MH bulb. Any inventors out there?
icon_biggrin.gif
 

dbman

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey if we're really interested in seeing this lighting help us out as reefkeepers, I suggest you do everything you can to contact fusion lighting (manufacturer) and plead our case so they know there's a market out here and that we are willing and big spending customers. If we play our cards right and get in on this thing early, they might end up catering to our needs much more than current lighting manufacturers do.
 

MattM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I saw some of the first prototypes of the sulphur microwave lamp at the Smithsonian several years ago. They were VERY yellow - like a high pressure sodium street light. From the article above it sounds like the color temp is better now. I hope so, cause the one I saw was very sickly.
 

dbman

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just recieved email from the sulfur lamp people; apparently they are already using their lamps at the Brookfield Zoo and the new shark tank at the Shedd aquarium with good results; supposedly the next generation lamp will have even better color fidelity and durability. Sounds like it might be promising for us in the next year or so.
 

Bishop1

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Chris H: I kinda wonder the same thing..

Sulfur Lights: I actually looked into buying a microwave sulfur lamp about a year ago. The company that was manufacturing them at the time had ceased as they were still under development.

Needless to say the approximate cost of 7000.00 for a setup kinda put the idea out of my mind for a while..

The nice thing is that only one light is needed for any size tank and you just run a light tube along the length of it.

Maybe when the price comes down.
 

MattM

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by chris_h:
<STRONG>Why dont they just use windows in outer space for lighting?</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Just a guess, but letting sunlight stream in a window might cause too much heat buildup inside.
 

chris_h

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It seems to me like a window would cause only light to come in, and an artificial light would produce both heat and light. I am thinking of the sun as a giant artificial light. The heat stays at the sun, and then the light shines in through the window.

[ September 27, 2001: Message edited by: chris_h ]
 

dbman

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Chris, if that were the case, the earth would be a very well-lit blue ice cube. The sun's radiation carries an enormous amount of heat energy.

I believe the problem with windows in space is that the only windows you can put on a spacecraft have to be very small and very thick - they're holding up against a pretty good deal of pressure and a very harsh environment; its not like they can just go to the local glass shop and spec. a big panoramic window for a space station, any more than we can do so for an aquarium. To get enough intensity to grow plants they would need a very large window area to let in enough light, which would create a very very heavy spacecraft. Weight is money in space.
 

chris_h

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dbman:
[QB]Chris, if that were the case, the earth would be a very well-lit blue ice cube. The sun's radiation carries an enormous amount of heat energy.
QB]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I am not saying that we do not get energy from the sun. I am saying the earth would be much hotter if we tried to light the entire earth with artificial lights hovering a mile above us.

Becouse there is no matter in outer space the waste heat can not travel to earth. We only get the rays. With artificial lighting you would get waste heat and the rays, making it much hotter.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by chris_h:
<STRONG>
With artificial lighting you would get waste heat and the rays, making it much hotter.</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes, but:

(a) The wavelengths we would generate with the artificial lighting would only be the ones we need, not all the extra useless ones in sunlight, which wouldn't contribute to photosynthesis,
(b) Sunlight would be much more intense than necessary (more intense than sunlight that reaches the Earth's surface),
(c) By having the light source closely concentrated on the plants, even less intensity is necessary,
(d) Windows on spacecraft are impractical, and aiming them towards sunlight is even more impractical.
 

dbman

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just for reference on the glass thickness, the amount of pressure a window on a spacecraft has to hold would be comparable to more than a 12 foot deep aquarium (1 atmosphere)... consider it takes half inch thick glass to safely make a 28" deep aquarium.....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Plus you'd have to have the window oriented in the right direction. Also, the sunlight is so harsh out there, it would have to be filtered.
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top