Tangs Rule
Advanced Reefer
- Location
- Staten Island
The clam I attempted was a little neck. I have two more but he didn't seem too interested.
I highly doubt it's flukes. The fish isn't showing any sign of flukes and if you look at the pictures, except for the tail, the fish looks fine. Also he has had the fish for over 3 weeks and if it has flukes it would be in very bad condition, or dead, by now.
I think it is flukes too. Freshwater dip is not enough. Read here: Flukes
Some flukes are too small to see with the human eye. Not for nothing but those pics are not the greatest (no offense Tangs Rule. Your pics are better than mine).
What is the harm in treating for them anyway? I'd rather treat for them on a fish that is not doing well then throw a suspiciously ill fish back into the DT. I wish I would have done that when I bought three Golden Butterflies. I would still have my stonefish and Rhinopias :irked:
The fish isn't showing any signs, it was though to have ich because of the white marks on the tail, which looking from the pictures isn't ich. Outside of not eating, which is common with Butterfly fish, especially a large one being kept in a small QT tank.
Actually the fish that usually show up infected are Angels, especially the large ones, and usually fish will continue to eat even when infected. Also the fish has been kept in an empty bottom tank, so you would have seen the eggs and larvae. Not to mention that in a small closed system, QT tank, the flukes would have attack the fish and it would have been in very bad condition, if not dead, by now.
Currently they are 3 - 4 inches and they are going into a 150.
Some flukes are too small to see with the human eye.
What is the harm in treating for them anyway? I'd rather treat for them on a fish that is not doing well then throw a suspiciously ill fish back into the DT. I wish I would have done that when I bought three Golden Butterflies. I would still have my stonefish and Rhinopias :irked:
Flukes are usually visible in the eyes, eyes appear to be cloudy, tough to tell in the pics.
I treated the 450 with prazzi pro, my regal showed signs of flukes cloudy eyes scratching on rocks, I wanted to try the prazzi pro to see if it eliminated the AEFW I had, so I now had a reason to try
none of the fish or inverts were effected by the 2 week treatment I did
my soft corals seemed reluctant to open though but none of the fish swere stressed and the regal recovered fully
I dont see any evidence of the AEFW all I have left acro wise is a couple of frags and a small millipora colony that seems to be fine.
The only draw back to the prazziPro treatment was it took forever to dial my skimmer back in. it took about a week to get things back to normal
this all shouldnt be a problem in a Q/T tank
I was just having a discussion about freezing praziquantel on pellets and feeding them to the fish in a controlled scenario so I can make sure no pellets are left behind. What do you all think? Worth a shot? I don't have much SPS.
Well I know the butterfly is in a small tank currently, but I'm going to keep him in there and treat that tank for flukes.
Does flukes medication kill off live rock? It sounds like a good treatment for a FOWLR tank, as long as it won't kill off my live rock.